<aside> ✉️
From: Monte <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2023 at 11:57 AM To: Gutierrez, Michael A. <[email protected]> Subject: Dark Matter is a Misconception
Hello, Michael. Modern Cosmology is making their observations fit their theory, missing the key component to galaxy evolution.
All the stars in all the spiral galaxies are not orbiting their centers, they are all spiraling INTO their centers. This is why all the Milky Way stars travel at 220 km/sec, not because of Dark Matter.
The centers of galaxies are eternal- only the matter spiraling inward is less than 14 billion years old. The centers feed on the inbound material, and eject elementary particles back into space; a perpetual cycle of creation and destruction.
Every spiral galaxy clearly shows matter spiraling inward. This means that there was no Big Bang, there is no Dark Matter, and the Universe is not expanding. Since the centers eject matter, by definition they cannot be black holes.
Global Warming is a direct result of increasing proximity to the center of the Milky Way. Each day we travel 11.8 million miles closer to the center. Very soon the oceans will become too warm to remain liquid, and will evaporate into the atmosphere.
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023, 12:00 PM Gutierrez, Michael A. <[email protected]> wrote:
Sorry, who are you? Is this a joke? Why are you emailing me?
Tell me more about this Global Warming <-> Milky Way center theory?? I’m curious.
Would you like to write an Op-Ed for Caltech’s student newspaper on this topic? I’m the editor, and I’d be happy to publish it.
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
From: Monte <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2023 at 12:06 PM To: Gutierrez, Michael A. <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Dark Matter is a Misconception
Thank you for your response.
I have been studying spiral galaxies since the Voyager missions launched. I have never believed in the Big Bang theory, simply because there is not a single scrap of visual evidence to support it. In fact, galactic mergers are direct visual evidence against a Big Bang origin.
Conversely, every spiral galaxy clearly shows matter spiraling inward. This is why all the Milky Way stars travel at 220km/sec.
I have measured the Fibonacci spiral in geologic time to illustrate this natural phenomenon. The polar ice caps have been shrinking for 55 million years, not 11,700 years.
I have been notifying scientists for six years, but nobody believes what every spiral galaxy clearly indicates.
Once the polar ice caps disappear the oceans and air will quickly become inhospitable to all Life.
I would love to have this published! The end of Life on Earth is rapidly approaching. Please let me know what else I can provide you.
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
From: Monte <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2023 at 12:22 PM To: Gutierrez, Michael A. <[email protected]> Subject: Op-Ed
Please visit my website. It has everything you need to know about my theory. My white paper is available there, and attached below.
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023, 12:25 PM Gutierrez, Michael A. <[email protected]> wrote:
Thanks Monte. That document is a bit long to publish in our newspaper; could you send me a condensed version, 1000 words or less, geared toward a general audience? I think our readers would be particularly interested in the Global Warming aspect of this theory, including the specific mechanics of the heat transfer, etc. And also include a brief bio about yourself, to introduce yourself to readers, and where they can contact you or learn more.
If you could forward it to [email protected] with “Op-Ed Submission” in the subject line, that would be great. Please get it to me by the end of this week if you can!
Thanks!
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
From: Monte [email protected] Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2023 at 12:28 PM To: Gutierrez, Michael A. [email protected] Subject: Re: Op-Ed
Perfect! I'll be in touch...
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023, 12:40 PM Gutierrez, Michael A. <[email protected]> wrote:
This is an interesting theory – I have some questions about it, if you’ll humor me.
First of all, you said that “Modern Cosmology is making their observations fit their theory”. This is a really important point to consider, I think, throughout all fields of science. Good science, of course, is agnostic to the scientist’s preconceptions of what should be true or false. But we’re human, and we inevitably end up doing bad science sometimes. So I’m curious about your perspective in particular, how do you think the field of modern cosmology has ended up with a vested interest in perpetuating a false theory? Is it in pursuit of someone’s self-gain or fame? Whatever it is, it can’t be in the pursuit of good science.
Also – you mentioned you’ve been studying spiral galaxies since the Voyager missions launched. That was quite some time ago! Where were you studying back then? What kind of research have you done? Observational? Theoretical? Do you have any publications?
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
From: Monte <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2023 at 1:04 PM To: Gutierrez, Michael A. <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Dark Matter is a Misconception
Here's my take:
Galileo Galilei was the father of observational astronomy. He discovered that the Earth is not the center of the Universe. He said,
"All truths are easy to understand, once they are discovered. The point is to discover them."
Einstein was a parlor magician. He created the concept of curved space, and the whole world bought it. He basically said,
"Believe this bit of nonsense, and all of that MUST be true."
But if space was curved, the evidence would be ubiquitous. The Moon, Earth, planets, Sun and stars would all exhibit this phenomenon.
The past one hundred years have been a quest to prove Einstein correct, despite all the visual evidence to the contrary. But one only has to objectively observe any spiral galaxy to see matter spiraling inward.
Right before my tenth birthday, the Voyager missions launched. I got a reflector telescope for my birthday, and my interest switched from dinosaurs to galaxies. In 1977, they had discovered the furthest visible galaxies, only 800 million years after the Big Bang.
For the last 46 years, every new discovery has been only 800 million years after the Big Bang.
The observation that all the Milky Way stars travel at 220 km/sec was made long before Einstein's false reality. Instead of putting that and what all spiral galaxies show together, they blindly stated that the constant motion was due to Dark Matter. And everyone blindly accepts it.
My attempts to get peer reviewed were thwarted. I was told by the astrophysics journals that my theory is, "inappropriate for peer review." So I spend my time notifying scientists individually.
I'm happy to answer any other questions.
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023, 1:08 PM Gutierrez, Michael A. <[email protected]> wrote:
Sure; but why do you think everyone blindly accepts it? Isn’t that completely contrary to the goals of science?
Also, re: Einstein. You say that “the whole world bought it”, his theory of curved spacetime. Again, I ask, why would the whole world accept it if it was so easily shown to be false?
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
From: Monte <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2023 at 1:14 PM To: Gutierrez, Michael A. <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Dark Matter is a Misconception
Simple. People are sheep. Einstein knew it, and took advantage of it. People would rather accept the fantastic without evidence, than to believe what their own eyes can see.
Your reply was the first in 6 years to even acknowledge the possibility that this is true. Most responses are negative and sarcastic.
People want to believe that we have 5 billion years left...
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
From: Monte [email protected] Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2023 at 1:26 PM To: Gutierrez, Michael A. [email protected] Subject: Galactic Furnace Theory
As well as being supported by visual evidence, my theory logically explains:
"All truths are easy to understand, once they are discovered. The point is to discover them."
"You can't teach a man anything; you can only help him to find it within himself."
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
On Wed, Dec 27, 2023, 1:27 PM Gutierrez, Michael A. <[email protected]> wrote:
Haha, people are indeed sheep; that rings all too true these days.
That’s something I think we see in a lot of popular science today; we have the Avi Loeb’s and the Mitchio Kaku’s selling people books about aliens and alternate universes and etc.
But the scientific community, especially the experts in those respective fields, definitely do not just play along, as much as they might like to believe in visiting interstellar intelligent life forms. Because if you actually look at the evidence it’s simply not there.
It seems like you’re making a similar argument about Einstein, but I’m a little surprised that you’re claiming that even the scientific community blindly accepts general relativity.
I’m a physics student (as I’m sure you know, given you found the emails of all of my other physics colleagues too). My friends who are taking classes on relativity right now are doing quite the opposite of blindly accepting it. They are spending hours and hours per week working through the math of general relativity to see for themselves that it works.
I’m just curious and a little unclear how you can draw a comparison here.
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
From: Monte <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, December 27, 2023 at 1:31 PM To: Gutierrez, Michael A. <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Dark Matter is a Misconception
Therein lies to your fatal flaw. The scientific community is trying to create new math and new physics to validate a theory that is simply wrong.
My last email about the Galactic Furnace Theory would fit nicely right here.
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
</aside>
<aside> ✉️
</aside>